ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Effectiveness of Two Different Electrotherapy Agents on Central Sensitization
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), interferential currents (IFCs) and sham devices in improving central sensitization (CS) findings, including pressure pain thresholds, pain catastrophizing, depression, and kinesiophobia in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation in Healthy Adults#849708
- Motor System Activation With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Physical Exercise to Reduce Pain in Elderly#837118
- Technology-based Hand Rehabilitation in Older People#1214295
- Relationship Between Central Sensitization Levels and Treatment Outcomes in Frozen Shoulder Treatment#1214037
- Acute Effect of Passive Joint Mobilization in Non-Specific Neck Pain#1047961
Record · ID 1363308
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive