ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
AR vs In Person Simulation for Medical Workplace Training
This study will evaluate the physiologic and emotional effects of an augmented reality (AR) simulation versus an in-person simulation. This is a single institution, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. The target enrollment will be 100 participants in each group for a total of 200 participants. One group will wear an AR headset and participate in an AR medical crisis scenario and the other group will participate in the same scenario with a traditional, mannequin based in situ simulation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Students' Experiences of Presence and Learning Across Simulated and Virtual Patient Formats: A Cross-Sectional Study.#338314
- Keeping it Real with Virtual Reality: A Case Study on Student Performance#238427
- Virtual Interactive Practice: a strategy to enhance learning and competence in health care students#289658
- The Effect of Avatar Realism in Immersive Social Virtual Realities#657598
- Psychological Harm in High-Fidelity Simulation: A Concept Analysis.#354527
Record · ID 1363656
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive