ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single-Row Versus Double-Row Repair for Achilles Insertional Tendinopathy
Achilles insertional tendinopathy may require surgical debridement and tendon reattachment when non-operative treatment fails. Single-row and double-row repairs are used, with biomechanical studies favoring double-row, but clinical evidence of improved outcomes is lacking and costs are higher. This multi-center randomized trial will use the VISA-A score to compare outcomes and inform cost-effective, evidence-based surgical care.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study of Re-operation Rate After Introduction of Evidence Based Algorithm for the Treatment of Ankle Fractures#1292864
- Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Gastrocnemius and Achilles Tendon in Plantar Fasciitis#1292606
- Individualized Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture#1211923
- Peroneal and Achilles Tendon Repair Indications With CLARIX® CORD 1K#1184276
- Evaluation of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Treatment in Tendinopathies#846921
Record · ID 1365416
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive