Initial Stay Times and Heat Mitigation Controls for Uncompensable Occupational Heat Stress - Part I

Workplaces rely on upper heat stress limits provided by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) to manage the health and safety of workers in hot environments. This is primarily achieved by interspersing work with rest periods, the length of which is dictated by environmental conditions and work intensity, to maintain core temperature at or below 38.0°C (equivalent to a 1°C increase in body core temperature above resting levels). However, these guidelines employ a "one size fits all" approach to exposure limits that does not consider individual variation between workers. Moreover, they fail to provide direction on the safe, initial stay times before these heat-mitigation controls should be employed (i.e., rest breaks) in conditions exceeding upper heat stress limits. While recent work has generated estimates of the initial stay times for young to older men before heat-mitigation controls are required for moderate-intensity work, this information is limited to a single work bout and does not consider a second work bout preceded by an extended rest period (e.g., lunch) or next day effects. This is a key consideration, as prolonged work in the heat has been shown to cause next-day impairments in heat dissipation in older men. Further, it remains unclear if the application of the prescribed ACGIH work-rest allocations thereafter would alleviate increases in core temperature for the duration of the work period (e.g., start of shift versus post-lunch period). This project will address these knowledge gaps by determining if refinements in initial stay times for moderate-intensity work (represents the average work effort of physically demanding occupations) in the heat (26°C wet-bulb globe temperature) may be required for young and older adults for i) a second work bout that is preceded by an extended rest period such as a lunch break, and ii) a work bout performed on the next day. This includes assessing the efficacy of the prescribed ACGIH wo