CanLII
metadata only
Deep v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)
Decided: 2026-10-15. Docket: IMM-29892-26. Citation: 2026 CanLII 108636 (FC). Citizenship and immigration — Removal — Stay of removal — Tripartite test — Whether a serious issue was shown for judicial review of deferral decision — Requirement for “quite a strong case” under Baron v Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) — Disagreement with administrative decision and rehash of prior matters — Stay refused | Procedure — Motions — Urgent stay motions — Federal Court practice — Should the Court decline to entertain a last-minute stay motion — Fairness to Respondent and interests of justice in timely filing — Consolidated Practice Guidelines for Citizenship, Immigration and Refugee Protection Proceedings, para 16 — Motion heard but lateness weighed — Motion dismissed | C
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adams v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)#1266820
- R. v. Brown#1053802
- Celik v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1219745
- DesRoches v. Canada#1158532
- Sanchez Et Al. v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)#1313177
Record · ID 1368051
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive