Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository
metadata only
Dirty Experts: Ethical Challenges Concerning, and a Comparative Perspective on, the Use of Consulting Experts
U.S. attorneys often hire consulting experts who potentially never get named as testifying experts. The same practice is evident in Australia, where the colloquial distinction is between a “clean” and a “dirty” expert, the latter being in the role of a consultant who is considered a member of the cl
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LAWYERS AS AML/CFT GATEKEEPERS IN UZBEKISTAN: LEGAL CHALLENGES AND FUTURE PROSPECTS#27499
- Relationally Responsive Expert Trustworthiness#732631
- The ethics of expert communication#88226
- Knowledge and truth: A skeptical challenge#703723
- Unreliable emotions and ethical knowledge#100549
Record · ID 1368801
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive