Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository
metadata only
Strategic Idealizations of Science to Oppose Environmental Regulation" A Case Study of Five TMDL Controversies
Proponents of environmental regulation have catalogued various strategies used by takeholders to delay or weaken regulatory efforts, including (1) manufacturing or magnifying uncertainty; (2) demanding “sound science” (and thereby imposing unreasonable standards of evidence); and (3) data quality in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Environmental Sustainability and Regulation: To-Down Versus Bottom-Up Regulation#499686
- Beyond Academia : a case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research#667074
- Science-Based Environmental Interpretation for Investment and Public-Interest Decisions#120694
- Science-Based Environmental Interpretation for Investment and Public-Interest Decisions#120693
- The Theory of Legal Regulation: Current Discourse and Criticism#1178011
Record · ID 1368811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive