ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Different Grafting Strategies
The aim of the present study was to compare the half-packed grafts that are covered with either a collagen or a nonresorbable membrane to the conventional alveolar ridge preservation procedures involving full-packed grafts and collagen membrane. The primary purpose was to evaluate the bone dimensional changes between the groups, and the secondary objective was to assess the potential contributing factors to clinical, radiographic and implant-related outcomes under different alveolar ridge preservation procedures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft Versus Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft.#905245
- Impact Of Soft Tissue Manipulation On Dimensional Changes After Posterior Region Extraction.#856790
- Piezosurgical Buccal Plate Repositioning Technique for Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation#1010716
- Alveolar Ridge Changes Post Tooth Extraction With Socket Shield Without Immediate Implant Placement"#886180
- Evaluation of the Prevalence Rate and Related Risk Factors of Ridge Preservation#900435
Record · ID 1370985
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive