ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Magnetically Navigated vs. Manually Guided Radiofrequency in Atrioventricular-node-reentry-tachycardia
The MAGMA-AVNRT study compares two different methods of handling the ablation catheters for av-node-reentry-tachycardia with regard to x-ray dose, safety and success: manually guided vs magnetically navigated RF-catheter.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can MRI Evaluate Beta-blocker Response in Portal Hypertension?#414376
- Effect of Septal Versus Apical Pacing- a Comparative Study Using Cardiac MRI#993521
- Magnetic Occult Lesion Localization and Imaging (MOLLI)#855334
- Fast, automated, real‐time 3D passive balloon catheter tracking during MRI ‐guided cardiac catheterization using orthogonal projection imaging and real‐time image‐based catheter detection#1312380
- PET/MR Imaging In Patients With Cardiac Amyloidosis#813297
Record · ID 1371802
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive