ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effectiveness of Different Membrane Applications in Vertical Ridge Augmentation
This randomized clinical trial (RCT) study investigates if there is any difference in absolute vertical bone gain between perforated dense-polytetrafluroethylene (d-PTFE) mesh vs perforated d-PTFE mesh covered with a native collagen membrane. The primary endpoint is absolute vertical bone gain. The secondary endpoints are regeneration rate, complications rate, and pseudoperiosteum formation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Guided Bone Regeneration Using Fixed vs Non-Fixed Resorbable Collagen Membranes#877161
- Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Cross-linked or Non-cross-linked Collagen Membrane#810729
- Horizontal Bone Augmentation of Alveolar Ridge#831857
- Autologous Fat Grafting Versus Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for Volume Augmentation#893389
- Reconstruction of Deficient Atrophic Ridges Using Guide Bone Regeneration Technique#1363275
Record · ID 1372481
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive