ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Manual Therapy Versus Conventional Rehabilitation Protocol on Subacromial Pain Syndrome
This study compares the periodic effects of Accelerated rehabilitation protocol (ARP) and Mulligan mobilization with mowement method (MWM) in subacromial pain syndrome patients rehabilitation. Half of the participants will receive ARP, while the other half will receive MWM.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intensive Upper Extremity Training Program During the Early Subacute Phase After Stroke: A Feasibility Study#855420
- Maitland Mobilization Versus Mulligan Mobilization in Sub-Acute and Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain#826478
- Mulligan vs Maitland With Home-Based Exercise for Non-Specific Neck Pain#814052
- Mulligan Technique Versus McKenzie Extension Exercise Chronic Unilateral Radicular Low Back Pain#1362626
- Functional Recovery and Pain Reduction Post-hydrodissection vs Rehabilitation in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (Hydrocarpal)#1150600
Record · ID 1372540
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive