ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Tubeless Tracheal and Carinal Reconstruction
In recent year, non-intubated anesthesia had emerged as an available alternative for thoracic procedure. Whether non-intubated tracheal/carinal reconstruction confers distinct perioperative advantages over the conventional intubated approach remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and perioperative outcomes of non-intubated versus intubated approaches in tracheal and carinal reconstruction.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Tubeless VATS for Mediastinal Neoplasm#883078
- Early Tracheostomy Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Severe Head Injury#909435
- Effects of electroacupuncture-assisted tubeless anesthesia versus double-lumen endotracheal intubation anesthesia on the quality of postoperative recovery in thoracoscopic surgery: A propensity score-matched retrospective study.#322825
- Comparison Between Bronchoscopy and Real- Time Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Tracheostomy#1112397
- Lung Protective Ventilation and Driving Pressure Guided PEEP Titration in CABG Surgery#995549
Record · ID 1373024
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive