ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Emergency Versus Elective Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis in the Era of Laparoscopy.
The aim of study is compare outcome of patients undergoing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours from the begging of symptoms to those of patients managed conservatively and operated late after 6-8weeks after the inflammatory reaction has subsided.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- the Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis Within and Beyond the First 72 Hours, Does it Differ?!#1308609
- Comparative Study of Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1072246
- Transdermal Buprenorphine Patch for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy#1352347
- Impact of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy in the Management of Acute Cholecystitis.#836967
- Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine Nebulization for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Surgery#876705
Record · ID 1373128
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive