Springer Nature OA
open access
Argument Relation Identification
artificial-intelligencecomputational-linguisticscomputer-sciencedata-mining-and-knowledge-discoverynatural-language-processing-nlpstatistics
Identifying the relations between argument components, the topic of this chapter, becomes relevant when the constellations between the ACs are ambiguous—for example when the same text has more than one claim and several premises that need to be linked to ‘their’ claim. Another constellation is seria
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments#335838
- The Relatum Problem in Persistence: Why Identity Criteria Cannot Determine Their Own Domain#696131
- What is wrong with arguments from reference?#711501
- An Act-Based Approach to Assertibles and Instantiables#94744
- CLAIR-Fin: An Adversarial Multi-Agent Framework for Claim-Level Verification and Adaptive Debate in Cross-Modal Financial QA#985211
Record · ID 1374694
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive