ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Influence of Neostigmine vs. Sugammadex on PORC and PPCs by Ultrasonography
This trial aims to compare the incidence of postoperative residual curarisation (PORC) and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in the SUG and NEO group by means of diaphragm ultrasonography and LUS, so as to conclude whether SUG can outperform NEO in preventing occurrence of PORC and PPCs.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine Use in Patients Undergoing Septoplasty Operations#885157
- A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF COMPARISON BETWEEN NEOSTIGMINE VERSUS SUGAMMADEX AS REVERSAL AGENT IN PATIENTS POSTED FOR INTERVENTIONAL PULMONOLGY PROCEDURES.#1242668
- Clinical-ultrasonographic Assessment of Pulmonary Emphysema#1307898
- Features of Regional Perfusion of Lung Consolidation#1376468
- Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine in Pediatric Less Than Two Years Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization#1310735
Record · ID 1375776
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive