ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Older Adults
The aims of this study were to: 1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy older adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength. 2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training in older adults. Older adults are defined as being 60 or more years of age.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults#849797
- The Effect of Novel High-intensity Interval Training on Physical Fitness in Older Adults#827608
- Reducing Falls With Progressive Resistance Training for the Oldest Old Adults With Reduced Muscle Strength#1321875
- Tailored Versus Traditional Resistance Exercise#847194
- Fatigability and Physical Performance: Effects of Resistance Training Variables Manipulation#877421
Record · ID 1376563
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive