Artificial Intelligence Model for Renal Allograft Rejection Identification, Lesion Quantification and Rejection Risk Prediction Based on Prospective Renal Transplant Pathology and Clinical Multidimensional Data

This prospective research collects leftover kidney biopsy tissue slides and matching routine clinical data from patients who received kidney transplants and underwent standard kidney puncture biopsy at Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital starting November 2025. A total of around 1,000 patient samples will be included, covering transplant rejection (including TCMR and ABMR subtypes, acute and chronic rejection), polyomavirus infection and recurrent original kidney disease after transplantation. All study materials come from residual biopsy specimens generated during regular clinical examinations, with no extra invasive operations, additional medical costs or physical trauma for participants. We will scan pathological slides into digital images and combine them with patients' medical records, lab test results, medication history and follow-up information. After full anonymization and standardized labeling by senior renal pathologists following the Banff standard, we will build an artificial intelligence (AI) multi-task model. This AI system will serve three core clinical functions: accurately distinguish different types of transplant kidney lesions, quantitatively measure tissue damage caused by rejection, and predict the risk of recurrent rejection after surgery. We will optimize and verify the model's diagnostic accuracy, stability and reliability through dataset segmentation, cross validation and algorithm adjustment. For patients, this study brings no extra physical or economic burden. If suspicious pathological changes are found during data analysis, relevant clues will be fed back to attending doctors to support individual treatment management. For clinical providers, the finished AI tool can reduce pathologists' reading workload, lower missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis caused by individual experience differences, especially improve detection of subclinical and borderline rejection. It helps clinicians evaluate injury severity and