ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Physiological Ventricular Pacing Vs Managed Ventricular Pacing for Persistent AF Prevention in Prolonged AV Interval
A multicenter, prospective, randomized study in a 1:1 ratio, single-blind with double-blind evaluation to evaluate the superiority of physiological ventricular pacing (proposed modality) vs. managed ventricular pacing (control) for prevention of persistent AF (PeAF) occurrence in patients with prolonged atrioventricular interval (PR≥180 ms) and indication for pacing: sinus node disease and/or paroxysmal type 1 or 2-second degree AV block.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Infant Chest Compression#902943
- Respiratory Physical Therapy on the Cardiac Autonomic Modulation Paediatric Patients#1337053
- Atrial Electromechanical Function in Endurance Athletes With and Without Atrial Fibrillation#1138334
- Acute Evaluation of the Safety of Left Ventricular-left Ventricular (LV-LV) Delays and Its Effects on Mechanical Dyssynchrony#1350412
- Impact of Basic Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on the Knowledge and Attitude of Professional Football Players and Coaches#1126902
Record · ID 1377651
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive