ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Robotic Surgery in the Treatment of Deep Endometriosis: Da Vinci Vs HUGO RAS Comparison
The aim is to clarify whether both surgical approaches represent, equivalently, a good treatment for the management of patients with deep endometriosis who are candidates for surgery, or whether there are any differences between the two methods, and, if so, how they differ
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Application of da Vinci SP for Endometrial Cancer Surgical Staging#832095
- Exploratory Study of the Interest of MRI Susceptibility Weighted Imaging for the Pre-operative Assessment of Pelvic Endometriosis Extent#1161578
- Imaging Comparison for the Preoperative Planning and Diagnosis of DIE: a Multicenter Retrospective Study.#993730
- ENDmetriosis and Reserve Ovarienne#1196101
- Recurrences After Surgery for Deep Endometriosis Depending on the Involvement of the Surgical Margins in the Specimen#1172797
Record · ID 1378005
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive