ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
RespiraSense Versus Capnography & Manual Counting
Your respiratory rate is your number of breaths per minute. The standard way for this to be measured is by a nurse looking at you for one minute and manually counting your breaths over this time. They normally do this once every few hours. At times, it can be useful to have your respiratory rate continuously monitored. A device that can do this is a capnograph. For the patient, this involves wearing a tube in their nose and around their ears while trying to minimise their movement and talking so the measurements can be taken. This research study is looking at a new respiratory rate monitor and comparing how well it works against the current accepted methods. Patients who are admitted to the Acute Medical Unit will be invited to participate should they meet all eligibility criteria. Subjects will be monitored for two hours: (i) For the first hour subjects will wear a capnograph, RespiraSense and have their respiratory rate manually counted by a research nurse. During this time the subject will be asked to keep talking and moving to a minimum. (ii) For the second hour subjects will wear RespiraSense and have their respiratory rate manually counted by a research nurse. During this time the subject can talk and move as they wish.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Exploration and Application of Intelligent Difficult Airway Assessment Scheme#1245909
- Clinical Comparative Study to Validate Performance of SafeSed Prototype Monitoring Endoscopy Under Sedation#886077
- AI-Integrated 3D-Printed Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Patients#1292607
- The Use of Capnography as a Guide for Oral Intubation#895720
- A Comparative Study of Airtraq Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Resident#1101781
Record · ID 1378920
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive