ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Effect of Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Versus Standard Care on Oxygenation and Ventilation During Propofol-based Sedation for Colonoscopy in Patients With High Risk of Airway Obstruction
The purpose of this study is to to compare oxygenation and ventilation on spontaneously ventilating obese patients or those with diagnosed or undiagnosed Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing day colonoscopy under Propofol based sedation, between the SuperNO2VA Et™ nasal positive airway pressure (PAP) device and routine care with face mask for oxygen (O2).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Nasopharyngeal Airway in Obese Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroenteroscopy Compared With Transnasopharyngeal Airway#1307394
- High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation During Sedated Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease#1115064
- HFNC vs Nasal Cannula in Mild Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation#888498
- Nasal Oxygen Therapy After Cardiac Surgery#1211726
- Awake Nasal Fiber-optic Intubation of Severely Obese Patients in Lateral Position#859948
Record · ID 1383276
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive