ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
ProLOVE - Prospective Randomized Study of Midline Incisional Hernia Treatment
This purpose of this study is to compare the recovery after an operation of an incisional hernia within the limits of the rectus muscles of the abdominal wall. The use of a mesh in the repair of a postoperative hernia is considered obligatory. Placement of a retromuscular mesh is done by open or laparoscopic surgery. Focus is on the recovery phase assuming a less painful recovery after a laparoscopic procedure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Long-term Follow-up of Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement After Emergency Laparotomy.#848276
- Clinical Study of Self-gripping Mesh in TAPP Versus Lichtenstein Hernia Repair#867377
- Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement Versus Primary Closure After Emergency Midline Laparotomy (PREEMPT)#1125064
- Prevention of Incisional Hernia With Mesh-suture at Umbilical Trocar Site.#1378946
- Pectopexy Surgery Without Mesh#1096192
Record · ID 1385115
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive