arXiv (All)
open access
When the implementation matters more than the algorithm: NSGA-II and other multi-objective optimizers in engineering design tools
90c29and-sciencecomputational-engineeringfinanceneural-and-evolutionary-computingoptimization-and-control
Engineering design tools increasingly embed optimizers as ready-made components that users select by algorithm name, while operator settings and bound, integer and duplicate handling stay fixed inside each tool. This study tests whether the name predicts the result. A tool-agnostic harness exposes o
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A practical evolutionary method for the multi-objective optimisation of complex integrated energy systems including vehicle drivetrains#445244
- EdgeVolution: democratizing multi-objective neural architecture search and end-to-end deployment on microcontrollers.#312461
- AlchemQ: Proof-Carrying Quantum Circuit Optimization with Per-Result Equivalence Certificates#1013761
- AI Tools Adoption across the Double Diamond Workflow: Phase, Mode, and Barriers in Designer Practice#1128915
- KLineage: Recovering the Missing When of Kernel Optimization by Deoptimizing Experts#1141552
Record · ID 1386376
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive