arXiv (All)
open access
High prevalence of antagonizing rhetoric in trending topics on Twitter/X
Disagreement between political opponents is a central element of democracy. This disagreement can be voiced in different ways. An opponent can be antagonized, i.e. portrayed as an enemy that needs to be overcome, or they can be criticized, i.e. treated as a legitimate adversary with whom one can eng
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis#780789
- Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis#779414
- Politicizing Mindshaping#705238
- Bridging the Divide: Using LLMs to Reshape Difficult Disagreements#71473
- Why do they say I am committing a fallacy when I am just insulting someone?#787604
Record · ID 1386433
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive