arXiv (All)
open access
Designing an AI Agent That Does Not Tutor: Design Rules for Socratic Probing in Introductory Physics
Instructors need to know whether a student understands a concept, not only whether the student can produce a correct answer, and the two have come apart: a student can paste a physics question into a chatbot and submit a fluent, correct answer without understanding it. We built a conversational AI a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- M3 Birdseed Elementary Mathematics Task#939560
- FARL: A Fully Automated Pipeline of RL Interface and Solver Design#1326941
- Exploring Students' Usage Patterns and Ethical Considerations of Artificial Intelligence Tools in Tertiary Education at the University of Dhaka#27636
- From Agent-Based Opinion Models to Quantum Circuits: A Tutorial#203458
- Interpretation Misunderstandings about Elementary Quantum Mechanics#697198
Record · ID 1387238
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive