arXiv (All)
open access
VulnSAGE: Adjudicating SAST Reports by Connecting LLM Reasoning to Program Structure
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reports flag operations whose safety depends on project-specific context, and maintainers must decide which reports describe real defects. Large language models (LLMs) can interpret this context, but adjudicating a report with them requires the decisive cod
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VulnSAGE: Adjudicating SAST Reports by Connecting LLM Reasoning to Program Structure#1374957
- LLM-based Vulnerability Detection at Project Scale: An Empirical Study#1104949
- Antaeus: Hunting Repository-Level Logic Vulnerabilities via Context-Grounded LLM Reasoning#329018
- Agent4Spec: An LLM-based Agentic System to Optimize API Specifications through Automated Validation and Market Analysis#1297625
- Agent4Spec: An LLM-based Agentic System to Optimize API Specifications through Automated Validation and Market Analysis#1291872
Record · ID 1387324
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive