arXiv (All)
open access
To Trust Or Not To Trust Your Vision-Language Model's Prediction
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in aligning visual and textual modalities, enabling a wide range of applications in multimodal understanding and generation. While they excel in zero-shot and transfer learning scenarios, VLMs remain susceptible to misclassification
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- VLM4Cluster: Benchmarking Deep Clustering In the Era of Vision-Language Pre-training#1131849
- What Generation Knows: Unlocking Fine-Grained Understanding in Unified Multimodal Models#1388553
- What Transfers from Text to Vision? Capability Scaling Laws and Transfer Dynamics for VLMs#1248529
- Human-Grounded Calibration for Long-Text Image-Text Congruence in Vision-Language Models#1109621
- From Knowing to Abstaining: Bridging the Representation-Action Gap in Vision-Language Models#1116984
Record · ID 1388276
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive