arXiv (All)
open access
Bridging the Gap in the Responsible AI Divides
Tensions between AI Safety (AIS) and AI Ethics (AIE) have created what we term a "responsible AI divide." This divide has been persistent, and has dominated the public and policy discourse on AI, and increasingly shapes how governments, firms, and researchers define responsible AI, and so which AI r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Responsible and Trusted AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective (2026)#1317916
- Why we need an AI-resilient society#128239
- High-reward, high-risk technologies? An ethical and legal account of AI development in healthcare#679067
- Responsibility for AI Inventions#99999
- The Category Error in Contemporary AI Safety Discourse and Why Non-Sentient Systems Cannot Be Moral Machines#719047
Record · ID 1388344
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive