arXiv (All)
open access
Not What, But How: A Framework for Auditing LLM Responses across Positioning, Generalization, Anthropomorphism, and Maxims
Large language models (LLMs) are being increasingly used to answer subjective, information-seeking questions, where users are sensitive to how responses are communicated, not just whether the answers are correct. Existing LLM evaluations for subjective cultural queries largely focus on factual corre
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Alignment Veto: How Safety Training Suppresses Cultural Knowledge in LLMs#1296989
- TOWARDS EXPLAINING, EVALUATING, AND MITIGATING CULTURAL BIAS IN LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS#637484
- Aligning Language Models Towards Counterfactual Invariance#1387231
- Prompt Revision as a Source of Cultural Bias in Text-to-Image Systems#999057
- When the Judge Acts: Auditing VLM-Guided Image Selection on Culturally Situated Prompts#1156515
Record · ID 1388380
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive