arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating the Robustness of Proof Autoformalization in Lean 4
Proof autoformalization aims to translate a mathematical informal proof in natural language into a formal proof in a formal language such as Lean 4. Existing LLM-based models for proof autoformalization are typically evaluated only on well-formed informal proofs from curated datasets. We argue that
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Adaptive Proof Refinement with LLM-Guided Strategy Selection#997450
- ProofGap: Benchmarking Step-Level Formal Reasoning with Local Obligations Derived from Natural-Language Solutions#1077225
- FaithSieve: Fine-Grained Evaluation of Math Proofs with Faithful Formal Evidence#1354969
- LeanPolish: Verified Supervision for Lean Proof Compression#1142985
- Lean Graph Search for Formal Theorem Proving#1357994
Record · ID 1388385
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive