arXiv (All)
open access
What Makes a Latent Thought Valid? Defining and Auditing Thought Representations in LLMs
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), yet it writes steps as text and follows one reasoning path at a time, which limits the capabilities of such models. Latent reasoning methods replace these steps with continuous thought representations and clai
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CALR: Continuous Anchored Latent Reasoning via Render-of-Thought Compression#1216550
- How Many Thoughts Can a Vector Hold? The Capacity of Reasoning by Superposition#1083251
- Many Steps into One: Reasoning Contraction and the Limits of Safe Memory Reuse for LLM Agents#1342758
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1357971
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1348837
Record · ID 1388398
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive