arXiv (All)
open access
Harnessing Textual Refusal Directions for Multimodal Safety
Safety in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) depends on unsafe multimodal data for post-training alignment or activation steering. However, such data is hard to collect, must be gathered anew for each modality, and its collection and distribution raise ethical and legal concerns. In this work,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ReFrame: Evidence-Guided Test-Time Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models#662273
- ReFrame: Evidence-Guided Test-Time Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models#661223
- ReFrame: Evidence-Guided Test-Time Safety Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models#480106
- Representational alignment yields generalizable safety in language models#926872
- SafeEvo: Deciphering the Safety Alignment Mechanism and Evolution in Language Models#1233968
Record · ID 1388402
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive