arXiv (All)
open access
Parameter misspecification in physics-informed neural networks: A closed-form audit and its limits
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are trained to minimize the residual of a prescribed equation, so a low training loss does not indicate whether a coefficient in that equation was specified incorrectly. This study evaluates what can be inferred about the encoded parameter from the trained ne
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Label Propagation for Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Physics-Informed Gaussian Processes#1036517
- PACE-FNO: Physics-Aligned Canonical Equivariance for Fourier Neural Operators#1117425
- Sound Field Estimation around a Rigid Sphere with Physics-informed Neural Network#1117192
- Transferable Physics-Informed Representations via Closed-Form Head Adaptation#126512
- Sinc Kolmogorov-Arnold Network and Its Applications on Physics-informed Neural Networks#179083
Record · ID 1388514
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive