arXiv (All)
open access
LLM Evolutionary Search Strategies Should be Compared by Tokens
LLM evolutionary search is currently evaluated by counting proposals (candidate programs). We demonstrate this metric hides the true cost of search, and redo the comparison using tokens. By replaying 600 logged runs across 5 tasks and 3 methods, we show that proposal costs vary wildly from 16k to 39
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large Language Models and Evolutionary Computation: A Critical Review of Bidirectional Interaction, Automated Algorithm Design, and Co-Adaptive Systems#792630
- Large Language Models and Evolutionary Computation: A Critical Review of Bidirectional Interaction, Automated Algorithm Design, and Co-Adaptive Systems#788630
- How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Tasks#134612
- PBE Meets LLM: When Few Examples Aren't Few-Shot Enough#1232604
- Official Review · ICLR 2026#787103
Record · ID 1388543
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive