arXiv (All)
open access
Agents' Last Doubt: Knowing When to Act and When to Step Back in Tool-Using Agents
Tool-using LLM agents repeatedly face decision points under uncertainty, choosing between autonomous action, additional information gathering, and human escalation. These decisions require balancing task success against interaction cost and the risk of irreversible errors. Learning to make these tra
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Litmus: Zero-Label, Code-Driven Metric Specification for Evaluating AI Systems#1325194
- Candidate supply and answer selection shape the value of LLM judging in multi-agent systems#799099
- Candidate supply and answer selection shape the value of LLM judging in multi-agent systems#797676
- Sentry: Learning to Recover from LLM Agent Failures at Test Time#1187672
- From Uncertainty to Action: Learning to Steer LLM Agents#1233154
Record · ID 1388760
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive