arXiv (All)
open access
Who Speaks, Who Authorizes, Who Acts? Understanding Trust Boundaries in Multi-Agent LLMs
Multi-agent LLM systems exchange messages before acting through tools, but message delivery, signing authority, and tool-side enforcement are separate trust boundaries. We represent them as communication, authorization, and execution structures, and use the authority cut to characterize the smallest
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems#819724
- Delegation Without Trust: An Empirical Gap Analysis of Identity, Authorization, and Runtime Governance in Multi-Agent LLM Systems#809728
- Trust propagation and structural containment in Multi-agent LLM pipelines#1011379
- Autonomous governance integrating agentic AI and zero trust for intelligent cybersecurity in distributed enterprise ecosystems#990029
- Maat: Independent Deterministic Contract-Based Governance for Multi-Agent LLM Workflows#1119090
Record · ID 1388864
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive