arXiv (All)
open access
Harnessing Disagreement: Detecting Correlated Agreement Blindness in Multi-Agent Triage
Disagreement-triggered escalation can create a structural blind spot in multi-agent arbitration: as base learners improve, they tend to converge, weakening safety monitoring where correlated failures concentrate. We term this correlated agreement blindness and present ARAT (Arbitrated Reasoning Agen
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TRILOGUE: A Trilingual Spoken Dialogue Fact-Checking Benchmark with Evidence and Paired Audio#927740
- Multi-agent Undercover Gaming: Hallucination Removal via Counterfactual Test for Multimodal Reasoning#1325061
- Multi-Agent debate system based on large language models: structured deliberation and validation in satellite communications#450705
- Beyond Corrected Memory: Execution Consistency in Multi-Agent Systems#1217836
- RAVEN: Receiver-Conditioned Action-Value Encoding for Finite-Alphabet Multi-Agent Communication#1141885
Record · ID 1389360
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive