arXiv (All)
open access
Good Judgment, Bad Advice: Decision-Model Controllers Raise Agent Cost Without Improving Success
Agent scaffolds increasingly delegate small decisions (whether to stop, verify, or change approach) to cheaper models. We ask whether a typed decision model, Jev 1.13, consulted only at deterministic decision points, makes a Claude Sonnet 5.5 terminal agent cheaper without making it worse. In a pre-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reading Right, Acting Wrong: Diagnosing Decision Failures of System One Models in Agent Loops#1344080
- Utility-Level-Dependent Ambiguity#999437
- Mid-Harness: Scaling Actions Between Model and Harness for Terminal Agents#1145149
- Mid-Harness: Scaling Actions Between Model and Harness for Terminal Agents#1136882
- Persistent Partners Raise Prices Among Learning Agents#1129991
Record · ID 1389595
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive