arXiv (All)
open access
SecODD: Adapting the Operational Design Domain from Driving Autonomy to Autonomous Cyber Defense
Security operations centers are beginning to delegate detection, triage, and containment to Autonomous Cyber Defense (ACD) agents at execution time. Erroneous high-impact playbooks can disrupt critical services and create accountability gaps among deployers, SOC supervisors, vendors, managed service
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Evaluation Schema for the Ethical Use of Autonomous Robotic Systems in Security Applications#710878
- Desecuritising cybersecurity: towards a societal approach#1252612
- The Ethics of Autonomous AI Agents for Offensive Security#394331
- From Simulation to Healthcare: KINAITICS' AI Framework for Cyber-Physical Security.#338739
- OPTIMIZING CYBER PROTECTION TEAM OPERATIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF TASK SYNCHRONIZATION AND PROCESS AGILITY IN DEFENSIVE CYBER OPERATIONS#1278960
Record · ID 1389687
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive