arXiv (All)
open access
Leveraging Mental Models for Human-Centered Explanations: A Systematic Design Approach Illustrated by Explainable Fake Review Identification
Explainable AI (XAI) often prioritizes model fidelity over user intelligibility, yielding explanations that satisfy technical transparency yet fail to support human sense-making. We propose a human-centered approach, MIND-X (Mental-model INtegrated Design for eXplainability), which aligns explanatio
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Systematic Review of Human-Centered Explainability in Reinforcement Learning: Transferring the RCC Framework to Support Epistemic Trustworthiness#707577
- A Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems#1091971
- Beware of "Explanations" of AI#785053
- Beware of "Explanations" of AI#783463
- Taking the Whys Seriously: Limitations of Counterfactual Explanations in Justification and Recourse#818998
Record · ID 1389849
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive