arXiv (All)
open access
Visual Sufficiency Landscapes: Understanding Query-Conditioned Reliability in Visual Token Pruning
Different visual token pruning strategies retain different subsets while maintaining similar task performance. This motivates a combinatorial question: how many visual subsets can preserve model behavior, and how does their abundance depend on the query? We introduce visual sufficiency landscapes to
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AnchorPrune: Relevance-Anchored Contextual Expansion for Visual Token Pruning#999823
- QCPruner: Query-Conditioned Population Coverage for Visual Token Pruning#1033772
- Unpacking similarity effects in visual memory search: categorical, semantic, and visual contributions#281599
- How Much Can We Prune? Exploring the Performance Limits of Visual Token Pruning#1388540
- VPRune: Efficient Training-free Pre-LLM Visual Token Pruning#1061054
Record · ID 1389914
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive