CanLII
metadata only
Ma v Dai
Decided: 2026-10-16. Docket: CA50305. Citation: 2026 BCCA 409 (CanLII). Procedure — Vexatious proceedings — Filing restrictions — Supreme Court Act, s. 18 — Whether record supported finding of habitually, persistently, without reasonable grounds instituted proceedings — Discretionary order and appellate deference, error in principle or misconception of evidence — Ample bases in chronology of litigation — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Procedural fairness — Case management of abusive process — Whether discovery or cross-examination was required before vexatious proceedings determination — Refusal of examinations for discovery and cross-examination on affidavits to avoid prolonging abusive process — Represented party had opportunity to respond by submissions — No procedural unfairness shown
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mizrachi v. Salah#1391031
- Newton v. Grillo#1053797
- 1834537 Ontario Inc. v. Harmaz#1219748
- Avaliação de risco de irregularidades em processos de aposentadoria no âmbito do Tribunal de Contas do Estado da Paraíba: uma aplicação baseada em aprendizagem de máquina supervisionada#443367
- R. v. Corning#1090909
Record · ID 1391025
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive