CanLII
metadata only
R v D.B.
Decided: 2026-10-08. Docket: CACR3911. Citation: 2026 SKCA 111 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeal — Sexual interference, Criminal Code, s. 151 — Whether convictions can stand where jury not properly instructed — Trial centred on complainant credibility and disclosure evidence — Limiting instruction on disclosure evidence omitted — Convictions set aside and matter remitted for new trial — Appeal allowed | Evidence — Prior consistent statements — Narrative exception — Whether limiting instruction required for disclosure to mother — Complainant testified she told her mother “everything” and wrote it down — Prior statement admitted to explain fact and timing of complaint — Jury not cautioned against oath-helping use — New trial ordered | Evidence — Admissibility and use — Rule
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Musick#1368062
- R. v. T.U.#1204078
- R. v. Ray#1347101
- Warren Court Incrementalism and Indigent Criminal Appellants’ Right to Trial Transcripts#277786
- R v Alleyne#1251762
Record · ID 1391029
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive