CanLII
metadata only
R. v Goudie
Decided: 2026-10-13. Docket: 202501H0029. Citation: 2026 NLCA 34 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Sexual assault — Appeal — Misapprehension of evidence — Credibility and reliability — Whether trial judge misapprehended evidence on consent — Deference to trial judge’s fact-finding (R. v. Morrissey, R. v. Lohrer) — Unreasonable verdict alleged — Appeal dismissed | Evidence — Testimony — Language and meaning — “Sexual assault” terminology — Whether it was open to find a “language issue” — Complainant’s use of “made love” considered — Inconsistency “I don’t know. I don’t remember” assessed — No misapprehension found — Conviction appeal dismissed | Evidence — Corroboration — Credibility and reliability — Limits of corroboration on consent — Whether corroboration on non-consent facts
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Russo#1166778
- R. v. P.Q.#824288
- Sohal v. Bhatthal#1134342
- A Child (Fact Finding - Allegation of Sexual Abuse), Re [2026] EWFC 177 (B) (03 July 2026)#343353
- A Child (Fact Finding - Allegation of Sexual Abuse), Re [2026] EWFC 177 (B) (03 July 2026)#343303
Record · ID 1391032
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive