PICO: Performance Insights for Collective Operations
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2508.16809] PICO: Performance Insights for Collective Operations Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing arXiv:2508.16809 (cs) [Submitted on 22 Aug 2025 ( v1 ), last revised 11 Apr 2026 (this version, v2)] Title: PICO: Performance Insights for Collective Operations Authors: Saverio Pasqualoni , Tommaso Bonato , Lorenzo Piarulli , Torsten Hoefler , Marco Canini , Daniele De Sensi View a PDF of the paper titled PICO: Performance Insights for Collective Operations, by Saverio Pasqualoni and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: Collective operations are cornerstones of both HPC applications and large-scale AI training and inference, yet benchmarking them in a systematic and reproducible way remains difficult on modern systems due to the complexity of their hardware and software stacks. Existing suites primarily report end-to-end timings and offer limited support for controlled algorithm and configuration selection, fine-grained profiling, and capturing the runtime environment. We present PICO (Performance Insights for Collective Operations), an open-source framework that decouples portable experiment setup from platform execution, provides a backend-adaptive parameter selection interface across MPI and NCCL, supplies plain-MPI reference collective implementations, optionally instrumentable, and records the system configuration for reproducible comparisons. Evaluated on three major supercomputers, PICO shows that default collective algorithms and transport settings can be up to $5\times$ slower than the best available choice. It provides diagnostic evidence by isolating topology sensitive algorithmic choices and, through instrumentation, reveals detailed algorithmic breakdowns. To assess end-to-end effects of benchmark-informed tuning and evaluate application-level impacts, we replay open-source LLM training traces in ATLAHS simulator with optimized collective profiles identified by PICO, achieving reductions in training times of up to $44\%$. Subjects: Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC) ; Performance (cs.PF) Cite as: arXiv:2508.16809 [cs.DC] (or arXiv:2508.16809v2 [cs.DC] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.16809 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Journal reference: ISC High Performance 2026 Research Paper Proceedings (41st International Conference) Related DOI : https://doi.org/10.23919/ISC.2026.11520486 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources Submission history From: Saverio Pasqualoni [ view email ] [v1] Fri, 22 Aug 2025 21:30:59 UTC (2,543 KB) [v2] Sat, 11 Apr 2026 18:53:48 UTC (588 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled PICO: Performance Insights for Collective Operations, by Saverio Pasqualoni and 5 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.DC < prev | next > new | recent | 2025-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.PF References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Redundancy Protects Human Collaborations from Failure#1159828
- PASCAL: A Phase-Aware Shared-Cache Model for Parallel Scans#997387
- Third Meeting of the PSMA Strategy and Monitoring Working Group - Operational updates on the GIES#669839
- Benchmarking Storage Systems for Machine Learning Workloads Using NIO Bench#972485
- Characterizing the Configuration of Starlink Queuing#238558
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive