arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Benchmarking candidate coverage and rejection policy transfer in typed decision models
Rejection policies must remain useful as candidate sets and tasks change. We compare Laya, Jev and Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct using public reference labels, testing Laya/Jev policy transfer at equal calibration budgets and all three models on artificial omission, natural retrieval misses and public out-of-
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When the Right Answer Is Missing: An Arithmetic-Dependent Rejection Bottleneck in Jev#1144463
- Simpler Logarithmic Approximation Algorithms for the Optimal Decision Tree and Adaptive Set Cover#1402185
- Uniform Race: Parameter-Free Approximate Rejection Sampling#1128901
- Attractivity Weighting: Take-the-Best's Foolproof Sibling#772778
- PowerBench: Measuring Language Model Bias in Power-shifting Requests#1186617
Record · ID 1393805
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive