ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Biologic Versus Synthetic Mesh for Treatment of Paraesophageal Hernia
The investigators propose a randomized, single blinded controlled trial to compare the use of synthetic versus biologic mesh in hiatal hernia repair, two currently accepted standard of care surgical modalities. The investigators hypothesize that use of synthetic mesh will have lower recurrence at these time points compared to use of biologic mesh.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias#1075748
- Biologic Mesh Versus Synthetic Mesh in Repair of Ventral Hernias#879027
- ACELL Mesh for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair#916414
- PRELOOP Trial: Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia After Loop-ileostomy Closure#1376542
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
Record · ID 1397090
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive