ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Selection of Transcatheter Heart vaLve With Intermediate Sizing in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Treated With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved into a standard therapy for severe aortic stenosis across all surgical risk profiles, supported by pivotal trials in high- and low-risk populations. Two types of transcatheter heart valves, balloon-expandable and self-expanding, exhibit distinct hemodynamic and structural characteristics that influence procedural strategy and long-term durability. Accurate valve sizing is crucial for procedural success, as both undersizing and oversizing are associated with procedural complications, including aortic regurgitation, conduction disorders, valve embolization, annular rupture, and increased leaflet stress which may impair long-term durability. However, optimal annular sizing remains challenging due to the complex three-dimensional anatomy of the aortic annulus, which is oval, crown-shaped, dynamically deforming, and variably oriented. These anatomical features often lead to "grey zones" in clinical sizing charts, resulting in so-called borderline annuli in which the measured annular dimensions may indicate two suitable valve sizes. Borderline annuli are frequently encountered in patients undergoing TAVI with self-expanding valves (i.e., Evolut transcatheter heart valve series) due to a limited number of sizes (23, 26, 29 and 34 mm). Consequently, under- or oversizing of self-expanding valves is often required. However, sizing of transcatheter heart valves in borderline annuli is associated with a greater likelihood of procedural complications, higher rates of aortic regurgitation, and higher transvalvular gradients.9,11 New generation balloon-expandable valves (i.e., Myval transcatheter heart valve series) are introduced with intermediate (21.5, 24.5, 27.5 mm) and extra-large (30.5, 32 mm) valve sizes that are not available for the Evolut platform. These additional size ranges potentially offer more precise annular sizing, reducing the need for under- or oversizing and improving short- and long-term hemodynamic p
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis.#1087481
- Self-Expanding Hydra Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) Series Versus Balloon-Expandable Devices for Valve-In-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) for Patients With Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis.#1245372
- Evaluation of the BARD® True™ Flow Valvuloplasty Perfusion Catheter for Aortic Valve Dilatation#1139308
- CT Scan Sizing for Perceval Sutureless Valve#1113590
- Predicting procedural outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a scoping review of numerical patient-specific simulations#289147
Record · ID 1397458
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive