ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of stAndard and Hybrid Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of proximaL Aortic dissEctions
The study is devoted to the evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of patients with proximal aortic dissection. Two groups of patients with standard and hybrid surgery are compared. Early and long-term postoperative results are evaluated.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Standardization of Physician-Modified Stent Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms#829229
- Aortic Elongation and Dissection#888153
- Homemade Fenestrated Physician-modified Stent-grafts for Arch Aortic Degenerative Aneurysm#1231796
- BS-CERAB TECHNIQUE#1115027
- Scandinavian Trial of Uncomplicated Aortic Dissection Therapy#917074
Record · ID 1398044
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive