arXiv (All)
open access
Brittlebench: Quantifying LLM robustness via prompt sensitivity
Existing evaluation methods largely rely on clean, static benchmarks, which can overestimate true model performance by failing to capture the noise and variability inherent in real-world user inputs. This is especially true for language models, which can face human-generated text queries containing
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Complexity-Aware Evaluation of LLM Comprehension#1141727
- Complexity-Aware Evaluation of LLM Comprehension#1122361
- EvoMaestro: Toward Interpretable and Steerable LLM-Driven Program Evolution#1198995
- AutoTuneBench: Trustworthy Measurement for Agent Auto-Tuning of LLM Serving Engines#1011819
- Adaptive Testing for LLM Evaluation: A Psychometric Alternative to Static Benchmarks#1355545
Record · ID 1399812
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive